What is the safest distance from the 5G cell System?

If you've ever wandered through a town, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. They appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.

These smaller towers are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still cause issues for users.
The of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data that show that RF energy can be harmful to health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one Gram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This could result in a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.

Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 measured across 1 centimeter, and not exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
how to reduce emf in your home

If you've ever used a mobile phone, then you're aware that a safe range from the tower is at least 400 meters.  Visit this page  is because the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the further you are from it.

Although this may sound like a good idea, the reality is that people who live close to towers may actually be more prone to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those who were distance from them.

This study revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Another study has shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.

This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is utilized in wireless communications, may be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is important to understand because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and entry of toxic substances. Additionally,  how to reduce emf  is the biggest organ of the human body and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific research. These include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

This assumption does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals and the consequences on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. These assumptions do not correspond with current knowledge of the biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore, they should not be used for health protective exposure guidelines.

Furthermore to that, ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their radiation limits for local peak SARs that are based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. In particular it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.